This article was published on July 15, 2020

Uber and Lyft sued by Massachusetts over worker misclassification

California has a long running case against the companies and is not having much success


Uber and Lyft sued by Massachusetts over worker misclassification

The US state of Massachusetts filed a lawsuit against Uber and Lyft yesterday (Tuesday, July 14) saying that the companies are misclassifying their drivers as contractors when they should be employees.

This shouldn’t come as a surprise, the companies are coming under the exact same scrutiny in California.

“For years Uber and Lyft have built their billion-dollar businesses on a model that exploits drivers,” Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey said when announcing the lawsuit. “Uber and Lyft set the rates. They alone set the rules. Drivers are employees.”

[Read: German court slams the brakes on Tesla’s bogus ‘Autopilot’ marketing]

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol' founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It's free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

“For years these companies have systematically denied their drivers basic workplace protections and benefits, and profited greatly from it. This business is unfair and it’s also illegal under Massachusetts law,” she added.

We shouldn’t expect the state’s motion to change anything soon. Just like we’ve seen in California, Uber and Lyft will likely do everything in their power to prevent it from having to reclassify workers.

Last year, California passed state legislation called AB5 which requires gig-workers to be afforded basic rights like minimum wage, worker’s compensation, and more.

However, Uber and Lyft have continually contested the requirement and have collectively, along with some other companies, poured over $90 million into fighting the legislation.

In California, Uber says it will fight the lawsuit. A spokesperson for the company said: “At a time when California’s economy is in crisis with 4 million people out of work, we need to make it easier, not harder, for people to quickly start earning.” Though it seems Uber is missing the point as drivers don’t seem to earn enough to make it a viable job.

Last month, courts told ride-hailing companies that they must comply with the laws by July 1 or face closure in the state. But again, Uber, Lyft, et al., continued to fight the regulator.

While it’s promising that Massachusetts is following in California’s footsteps and fighting for the rights of gig-workers, it’s more than likely going to face the same fight that the California regulators are currently facing. Change won’t come soon or easy.

HT – The Verge

Get the TNW newsletter

Get the most important tech news in your inbox each week.

Also tagged with