This article was published on March 27, 2023

Deliveroo’s Dutch Supreme Court ruling provides little clarity for the sector

Employee or freelancer?


Deliveroo’s Dutch Supreme Court ruling provides little clarity for the sector
Si么n Geschwindt
Story by

Si么n Geschwindt

Riders working for Deliveroo are employees, not freelancers, the Dutch Supreme Court ruled on Friday, in a potentially precedent-setting case for the country鈥檚 platform economy.

The case was brought to trial by trade union FNV, which has been engaged in a legal battle with Deliveroo since 2018. The dispute started when the British firm announced it would discontinue work contracts for its delivery drivers, instead offering them the option to continue as freelancers. FNV immediately filed a lawsuit, arguing that the drivers deserved the legal protections afforded to permanent staff members.聽

FNV deputy president, Zakaria Boufangacha, said that, as freelancers, Deliveroo鈥檚 employees had virtually no say over pay rates and working conditions. 鈥淎s a result, they have to pay and arrange their own insurance, days off and pensions. And they don鈥檛 do it, because the pay is far too low,鈥 he said.聽

In 2019, the Court of Amsterdam supported the union鈥檚 stance, ruling that delivery workers were pseudo-freelancers because there was an established authority relationship between Deliveroo and its drivers. The company, judges argued, could monitor what the employees were doing, workers were not completely free to work when they wanted, and they had no say in the drawing up of their contracts, as freelancers would. The Supreme Court has now confirmed those rulings, putting an end to the years-long dispute.聽

Even though Deliveroo left the Dutch market last year, the ruling could have major implications for businesses that operate in a similar manner in the Netherlands, regardless of their sector, predicts FNV union leader Anja Dijkman.

鈥漈his Supreme Court ruling matters to hundreds of thousands of self-employed workers,鈥 she said. Dijkman says she has been concerned for years about the position of self-employed workers in the platform economy (those who work for online platforms like Amazon, Uber, and Airbnb).聽

The ruling, she said, will make it harder for companies like Deliveroo to try to claim their staff members are actually freelancers just because it is a cheaper way to operate a business. 鈥淚t will be case law that others can fall back on,鈥 she added.聽 聽

There are currently some 1.2 million self-employed workers in the Netherlands, and that number is growing daily. For years, the government has been working on new rules to clearly differentiate an employee from a self-employed person, but there has been little concrete progress to date. Trade unions and politicians are concerned about this legal grey area, and they say a clear definition is needed.聽

Margreet Drijvers, director of the interest group Platform Independent Entrepreneurs (PZO), believes that Deliveroo鈥檚 judgment does not provide this clarity. 鈥淭he Supreme Court has actually left everything as it was 鈥 no new criteria have been introduced to precisely define what exactly is or isn鈥檛 a self-employed person,鈥 she said.聽

Not all delivery drivers are happy with the verdict, either. 鈥淚 lost my job because of FNV,鈥 said former Deliveroo delivery driver Eddy. As a self-employed person, he can choose which rides he drives and how many hours he makes, he said. Now he works for Uber Eats.聽

In potentially good news for drivers like Eddy, employment lawyer, Joyce Snijder, also believes that the Deliveroo ruling will have little influence on similar cases 鈥 such as those involving taxi service Uber and temp agency Temper 鈥 which are currently before the courts.聽

Whether the case sets a precedent or not, one thing is for sure 鈥 as more and more workers enter the platform economy, the need for legal clarity for self-employed workers is becoming increasingly urgent.

Get the TNW newsletter

Get the most important tech news in your inbox each week.

Also tagged with